さまよう薬剤師のブログ

学位を持っても、センスのない、感染制御専門薬剤師のブログ.  I have Ph.D. but less sense ID pharmacist.

Linezolid versus vancomycin for skin and soft tissue infections.

Linezolid versus vancomycin for skin and soft tissue infections.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

2016年に報告された、皮膚・軟部感染症に対するLZD vs VCM に関する Cochraneレビュー。

 

Abstract

 

BACKGROUND

The morbidity and treatment costs associated with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are high. Linezolid and vancomycin are antibiotics that are commonly used in treating skin and soft-tissue infections, specifically those infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

 

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects and safety of linezolid and vancomycin for treating people with SSTIs.

 

SEARCH METHODS

For this first update of this review we conducted searches of the following databases: Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 24 March 2015; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL. We also contacted manufacturers for details of unpublished and ongoing trials. We scrutinised citations within all obtained trials and major review articles to identify any additional trials.

 

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing linezolid with vancomycin in the treatment of SSTIs.

 

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The primary outcomes were clinical cure, microbiological cure, and SSTI-related and treatment-related mortality. We performed subgroup analyses according to age, and whether the infection was due to MRSA.

 

MAIN RESULTS

No new trials were identified for this first update. We included nine RCTs (3144 participants). Linezolid was associated with a significantly better clinical (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.16) and microbiological cure rate in adults (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16). For those infections due to MRSA, linezolid was significantly more effective than vancomycin in clinical (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.17) and microbiological cure rates (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.32). No RCT reported SSTI-related and treatment-related mortality. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between linezolid and vancomycin (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.80). There were fewer incidents of red man syndrome (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.29), pruritus (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.75) and rash (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.58) in the linezolid group compared with vancomycin, however, more people reported thrombocytopenia (RR 13.06, 95% CI 1.72 to 99.22), and nausea (RR 2.45, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.94) when treated with linezolid. It seems, from the available data, that length of stay in hospital was shorter for those in the linezolid group than the vancomycin group. The daily cost of outpatient therapy was less with oral linezolid than with intravenous vancomycin. Although inpatient treatment with linezolid cost more than inpatient treatment with vancomycin per day, the median length of hospital stay was three days shorter with linezolid. Thus, total hospital charges per patient were less with linezolid treatment than with vancomycin treatment.

 

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid seems to be more effective than vancomycin for treating people with SSTIs, including SSTIs caused by MRSA. The available evidence is at high risk of bias and is based on studies that were supported by the pharmaceutical company that makes linezolid. Further well-designed, independently-funded, RCTs are needed to confirm the available evidence.

 

Analysis

 

f:id:akinohanayuki:20170610063328p:plain

f:id:akinohanayuki:20170610063350p:plain

f:id:akinohanayuki:20170610063409p:plain

f:id:akinohanayuki:20170610063712p:plain

f:id:akinohanayuki:20170610063726p:plain

f:id:akinohanayuki:20170610064315p:plain

f:id:akinohanayuki:20170610064330p:plain

 

Implications for practice

The poor quality evidence contained within this systematic review shows that linezolid seems to be more effective than vancomycin for the treatment of patients with SSTIs and SSTIs caused by MRSA.The lengths of stay in hospital were shorter, and the costs of treatment were lower, for people in the linezolid group compared to the vancomycin group.Fewer people in the linezolid group suffered from red man syndrome, pruritus and rash compared with vancomycin, but more people in the linezolid group suffered from thrombocytopenia and nausea.In spite of these results, the evidence may be limited by potential biases, so further evidence from higher quality trials is necessary before definite conclusions can be drawn. 

 

感想 

微妙な結果。今後の検討を待ちたいです。 

 

関連記事

 

akinohanayuki.hatenablog.com

akinohanayuki.hatenablog.com

akinohanayuki.hatenablog.com

akinohanayuki.hatenablog.com

akinohanayuki.hatenablog.com

akinohanayuki.hatenablog.com

akinohanayuki.hatenablog.com

akinohanayuki.hatenablog.com